Chicano! History of the Mexican American Civil Rights Movement.

Video. NLCC Educational Media, 1996.

The 1960s was a turbulent decade in American history, fraught with issues ranging from Civil Rights to Vietnam protests to student protests. Each of these influenced one another and other movements. One such understudied movement that had its beginnings in the 1960s was the Mexican American Civil Rights Movement. It encompassed a broad cross section of issues from restoration of land grants to farm workers rights to enhanced education to voting and political rights. The video documentary Chicano! History of the Mexican American Civil Rights Movement, a four-part documentary series, corrects this over sight and is an excellent resource for scholars and students. It is unique and ground-breaking for the material it covers and is one of the few documentary series to address the history of Mexican Americans broadly and the history of the Chicano Movement specifically. For these reasons, the series is an indispensable resource.

Chicano! gives one a sense of the unrest of the Mexican American population and the need for action. We witness, literally before our eyes, the growing awareness of collective history, of the power of mass action, and the evolution of the Chicano Movement. We learn that it begins in New Mexico with Reies López Tijerina and the land grant movement, is picked up by Rodolfo "Corky" Gonzales in Denver who defines the meaning of Chicano through his epic poem "I am Joaquin", embraces César Chávez and the farm workers, turns to the struggles of the urban youth, and culminates in growing political awareness and participation with La Raza Unida Party.

Rodolfo "Corky" Gonzales

Part 1 "Quest for a Homeland" discusses the beginnings of the movement by profiling Reies Lopez Tijerina and the land grant movement in New Mexico in 1966 and 1967. It shows how Tijerina's fight to convince the federal government to honor the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848) galvanized Mexicans and Mexican Americans across the Southwest. Part 1 then moves on to discuss Rodolfo (Corky) Gonzales and his founding of the Crusade for Justice in Denver in 1966. It discusses the importance of his poem "I am Joaquin" and highlights how Gonzales reached out to Chicano youth. This segment is useful for its discussion of the roots of Chicano nationalism through its affirmation of cultural identity grounded in Aztec myths such as that of Aztlán, the mythical Chicano homeland.

Part 2 "The Struggle in the Fields" examines the importance of César Chávez and his efforts to organize farm workers in the central valley of California. It delineates the various components of Chávez's strategy for farm worker self determination from strikes to boycotts to pilgrimages to fasts and emphasizes his commitment to nonviolence and the importance of faith and prayer in achieving his goal.

Part 3 "Taking Back the Schools" is the best of the six parts. It covers the Los Angeles high school blow outs of 1968 thoroughly and with passion. Part 3 is also likely to be the most interesting to students because they can witness young people their own age forcefully agitating for change.

Robert Kennedy with Harry Gamboa

It is also striking because the catalysts for the walk outs--high drop out rate, crumbling schools, lack of Mexican American teachers--still resonate today. This segment is visually interesting as well because the film makers made a conscious effort to interview actual participants (which they do in all the segments), and in this one they actually go back and forth between a photo or video of a participant from the 1960s to that same person being interviewed today, and it is fun to see how that individual changed in the intervening thirty years. For example, at one point the video discusses how the students were trying to garner outside support for their cause in order to legitimate it in the eyes of the school board. Robert Kennedy agrees to meet with student leaders and offer his support (he was running for president at the time and was in California to meet with César Chávez), and we see a picture of Kennedy surrounded by student leaders. The camera then focuses on a young Harry Gamboa—one of the walk-out leaders—standing next to Kennedy and the video then fades away to an current day interview with him.

Part 4 "Fighting for Political Power" discusses the creation of La Raza Unida Party as a third party force for political power and the importance of political rights. It culminates in the 1972 election and the Raza Unida convention and the fragmentation of the party at the height of its membership and recognition.

Each of these hour-long parts may be viewed individually. (It would, in fact, be very rare for a teacher to be able to devote all six hours to class time, even one specifically dealing with Chicano history.)

Reies López Tijerina

Nearly every segment, to its credit, treats the historical background surrounding the events. For example, "Quest for a Homeland" briefly discusses the Mexican American War and the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and why Tijerina felt that he was right to fight for the land. Similarly, in Part 4, the inequities of voting rights in Texas are explained to us along with the history of unequal distribution of political power in Crystal City, Texas, the birth place of La Raza Unida Party. Despite the fact that Mexican Americans made up the majority of the population in the city, no one of Mexican decent held political office.
Chicano! is very good at explaining the plight of Mexican Americans historically and at the time of the Movement. The series provides a keen sense of what it was like to have brown skin in the 1960s. One interviewee, for example, remembers that farm workers were thought of as ignorant, lazy, stupid, and dirty. While in another segment, a different interviewee recalls that being Mexican was a burden--that they had no respect and were treated as second class citizens.

As with most documentaries, Chicano! makes excellent use of photo archives and film footage of the time period. It succeeds where many documentaries fail in that the film-makers were able to interview the actual participants of the events, as opposed to only scholars of the subject.

Furthermore, the documentary series is to be commended for attempting to provide a balanced portrait of events. In the segment on the farm workers and César Chávez, for example, we hear from farm owners whose produce was boycotted and land picketed at the height of the protests. Similarly, the film makers interviewed school board members and high school officials of the time for its segment on the Los Angeles high school walk outs of 1968.

Not only does each of the six segments illuminate a distinct aspect of the movement (land, farm workers, politics, urban issues, education), but it also attempts to delineate the diversity of the Chicano Movement not merely through causes, but also through geography and demographics. The viewer learns of rural issues in California which are in stark contrast to the rural issues of New Mexico. The documentary distinguishes between issues surrounding the high school walk outs in L.A., as opposed to those in the Crystal City, Texas walk outs. The former occurred over drop-out rates and lack of recognition of Chicano culture and history, the latter due to Chicanas being barred from cheerleading. The students from L.A. never really had their concerns met while the students in Crystal City won their cause which, in part, led to the galvanization of the Raza Unida Party. We learn of the differing political agendas of Chicano leaders across the Southwest from Colorado, Texas, New Mexico, and California (Arizona is conspicuously left out of the equation).

While the discussion of the broad spectrum of issues across the Southwest is a strength of the series, it is also a weakness. For those whose only exposure to Mexican American history is through this series, the impression would be that Mexican Americans only live in the Southwest and that these are the only states that had active movements.

Alurista

This, of course, is not the case. Strong Chicano and Mexican American communities exist throughout the country and nearly all of them, particularly those in the Midwest, agitated for change and had their own movements at the local level and participated in happenings at the national level. This is, of course, a function of the series' length, and the film makers do make token references to other parts of the country. For example, during a segment on the Crusade for Justice and the first Chicano Youth Conference in Denver in 1967, the poet Alurista remarks how he was amazed to see so many Chicanos from all over the country, even Kansas. "I didn't know," he remarks incredulously, "there were any Mexicans in Kansas!" Similarly, in the series' discussion of the growth of La Raza Unida Party, the narrator, Henry Cisneros, informs the viewer that chapters of the party proliferated throughout the country, even in Nebraska.

What the individual videos do not do, however, is discuss the outcomes of the events in question or their significance. In part 1, for example, the film makers move from discussing Tijerina and the question of land grants to Corky Gonzales and the Crusade for Justice. The transition is fine, but we never find out what happened to Tijerina and his cause. The viewer is left hanging with no information. This also occurs in part 3 "Taking Back the Schools". The video follows the trend of events that occurred, culminating in the galvanization of the community to have Sal Castro, a teacher who supported the walk outs, reinstated after being fired by the school board. We are treated to video of the students' take over and sit in of the school board and their ultimate success in having Castro re-hired, but we are never told what happened with the students' original demands of the school board (bilingual education, Mexican American history courses, more Mexican American teachers). The film would have you believe that the walk outs were a success because the community came together in support of Castro. It never goes on to explain that the state of the schools remained virtually the same.

Also, Chicano! never explains until the end of the final video the continuing and overarching significance of the Chicano Movement and its legacy. It defines these as the new awareness of farm workers, increased labor activism, and growing visibility of educational and community needs. According to the documentary, the Chicano Movement galvanized and trained a new generation of activists and leaders and brought to a national stage a variety of issues important to the Mexican American community. However, the significance of each event needs to be further highlighted at the end of each segment for it to be truly effective.

For any one teaching the Civil Rights Movement; Mexican American, Chicano, or Latino history; activism; or political unrest, however, the series is a must see. Students will greatly benefit from such a remarkable series about an extraordinary time in history.

Valerie M. Mendoza
University of Kansas